HURLEY BURISH, S.C.
33 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 400
MADISON, WISCONSIN 53703

Call us at (608) 257-0945

info@hurleyburish.com

Pay Your Invoice Here

  • About Us
  • Services
    • Business, Commercial & Real Estate
    • Civil Litigation
    • Criminal Defense
      • Felony and Misdemeanor Allegations
      • Drunk Driving and Traffic Offenses
      • University Discipline and Underage Drinking
    • Estate Planning & Elder Law
    • Family Law
    • Mediation & Arbitration
    • Professional Discipline
    • White Collar Defense
  • Our Team
    • Abigail Carey
    • Jonas B. Bednarek
    • Cricket R. Beeson
    • Marcus J. Berghahn
    • Joseph A. Bugni
    • Mark D. Burish
    • Peyton B. Engel
    • Andrew W. Erlandson
    • Stephen P. Hurley
    • David E. Saperstein
    • Daniel J. Schlichting
    • Catherine E. White
  • Directions

Call us at (608) 257-0945

info@hurleyburish.com

Pay Your Invoice Here

  • About Us
  • Services
    • Business, Commercial & Real Estate
    • Civil Litigation
    • Criminal Defense
      • Felony and Misdemeanor Allegations
      • Drunk Driving and Traffic Offenses
      • University Discipline and Underage Drinking
    • Estate Planning & Elder Law
    • Family Law
    • Mediation & Arbitration
    • Professional Discipline
    • White Collar Defense
  • Our Team
    • Abigail Carey
    • Jonas B. Bednarek
    • Cricket R. Beeson
    • Marcus J. Berghahn
    • Joseph A. Bugni
    • Mark D. Burish
    • Peyton B. Engel
    • Andrew W. Erlandson
    • Stephen P. Hurley
    • David E. Saperstein
    • Daniel J. Schlichting
    • Catherine E. White
  • Directions

A previous post discussed the level of suspicion that an officer must articulate to justify a “stop” or otherwise initiate an encounter with a “civilian.” Generally speaking, a law enforcement officer initiates contact with a “civilian” because he or she suspects the civilian of some kind of wrongdoing. The officer may be mistaken, may have ulterior motives (prejudice, profiling, etc.), or may only be acting on a mere hunch. However, whether the officer’s justification was legal will only get sorted out after the fact, by a competent defense attorney filing a motion to suppress evidence. An accused should not attempt to argue that issue with an officer during the stress of an encounter. In spite of the possibly faulty reason for the encounter, the actions an accused person takes when confronted by law enforcement can, themselves, lead to criminal charges.

Resisting an Officer and Obstructing an Officer, both charged under Wisconsin Statutes Section 946.41 are two criminal offenses that focus on the conduct of an accused in the context of a police investigation. To “resist” means to oppose the officer by force or threat of force. To “obstruct” means that the conduct of the accused prevents or makes more difficult the performance of the officer’s duties. Both charges require the officer to be acting in an “official capacity” — performing duties that he or she is employed to perform — and with “lawful authority — meaning, the officer’s acts are not themselves in violation of law. Finally, to obtain a conviction for resisting or obstructing, the State must prove that the accused knew (had reason to know) that the officer was indeed acting in an official capacity and with lawful authority.

Although both resisting and obstructing an officer require some action, some volitional act, by the accused, either physical or verbal, obstructing is a bit trickier. An obstructing charge can result from an accused giving any information to an officer that is deemed to be false information. One obvious form of obstructing is when an accused gives false identifying information, such as a false name. Perhaps less obvious is an obstructing charge that arises when an accused denies involvement in the act that the officer is investigating. Any affirmative statement to police that a prosecutor thinks he can prove to be false could be charged as obstructing.

Police will often encourage an accused person to make a statement (to “come clean”) with the promise of a better outcome for being honest (“If you cooperate I’ll put a good word in with the prosecutor.”) Unfortunately, a confrontation with police is one of those exceptions to the maxim “honesty is the best policy.” Making a statement rarely, if ever, turns out well for an accused person. The best response to questions from police is “I do not wish to talk, and I want to speak to a lawyer.” It may feel uncomfortable or confrontational at the moment, but in the long run silence is the best policy.

National News:
The Sixth Shot Killed Him

Tags: criminal defense, drug possession, evidence, murder, profiling
How Does a Controlled Substanc...
Understanding Domestic Partner...

About author

About Author

HBS Admin

Other posts by HBS Admin

Related posts

Juvenile Justice

June 18, 2024
Author:  Attorney Catherine E. White Phone: 608-257-0945 Email: cwhite@hurleyburish.com The juvenile justice system is an often-overlooked, yet incredibly important, area of law. States address the... Continue reading

Nuts and Bolts Series: Criminal Court in Wisconsin Vol. 2 – Initial Appearances, Preliminary & Plea Hearings

July 7, 2020
Author: Attorney David E. SapersteinPhone: 608-257-0945Email: dsaperstein@hurleyburish.com This practical series, “Nuts and Bolts,” is intended to demystify the process of being charged with a crime... Continue reading

Nuts and Bolts Series: Criminal Court in Wisconsin Vol. 1 – Bail and Pretrial Release

May 15, 2020
Author: Attorney David E. SapersteinPhone: 608-257-0945Email: dsaperstein@hurleyburish.com This practical series, “Nuts and Bolts,” is intended to demystify the process of being charged with a crime... Continue reading

On False Statements & Talking to the Police

May 13, 2020
Author: Attorney Marcus BerghahnPhone: 608-257-0945Email: mberghahn@hurleyburish.com We advise our clients to not speak with law enforcement without first seeking the advice of counsel.  Because when... Continue reading

Parking Enforcement, Chalk, License Plates Readers and the Fourth Amendment

May 4, 2020
Author: Attorney Marcus J. BerghahnPhone: 608-257-0945Email: mberghahn@hurleyburish.com Given that parking tickets are probably one of the most common and annoying types of police contacts that... Continue reading

Comments are closed

SEARCH

Phone: (608) 257-0945

RECENT ARTICLES

  • What Can the Circuit Court Do While I’m Appealing My Conviction? March 20, 2025
  • 2024 Super Lawyers – Hurley Burish, S.C. November 22, 2024

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

TierOneBadgeHurley Burish, S.C. recognized as Tier One Law Firm in the 2021 U.S. News & World Report-Best Lawyers® Law Firm Rankings.

Learn More

ABOUT US

Dedicated to providing clients with the comprehensive, creative, and thorough work expected of large firms, HurleyBurish also maintains the personal working relationships and cost-effectiveness associated with smaller firms.

Learn More

  • Charitable Contributions
  • Newsroom
  • Services
  • About Us
  • Directions
  • Our Team

© 2025 Hurley Burish, S.C. All Rights Reserved.